4 mins read

Pak-US ties in doldrums

January 4, 2018

If one were to look at the 70-year old trajectory of relations between the United States and Pakistan one would conveniently describe them as of master and servant. Once we were called a cornerstone of American foreign policy — most trusted alley of Washington East of Suez where the Americans had air bases and footholds to carry out their anti-communist operations. These imperialistic concessions were given to them by Field Marshal Ayub Khan in exchange of military assistance and political legitimacy. Forty years down the road Pakistan has been rendered into tombstone of that foreign policy.

To understand Pakistan’s relations with United States — especially when they are in total mess — one would like to refer to two extremely relevant books. President Mohammad Ayub Khan’s book, Friends Not Masters — a sort of shikwa (Complain) with the super power for its treatment of its most trusted ally. On the opening page of his autobiography he gives his quote that says it all about relations that rose to sublime heights and then fell to the state of being ridiculous. His words “People in developing countries seek assistance, but on the basis of mutual respect: they want to have friends not masters”. Ayub Khan learnt much too late in the day the meaning of American phrase — “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch”.

In his treatise on foreign policy “Myth of Independence”, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto further sizes up from where Ayub left in his book, Pakistan’s bitter exploitation by the United States through its ingress in various institutions including defence. Based on his experience of being a key member of Ayub government as well as its foreign minister, he states that the situation Pakistan found itself in was such that every decision of any importance, even as regards matters that ought to have been of purely internal concern, was affected by some aspect, real or imaginary, of international relations, especially of commitments to the United States of America. Even some times American interfered in the posting of Section Officers. He became a thorn in the eyes of the American when in 1960 as Minister for Fuel, Power and Natural Resources he negotiated with the Soviet Union for an oil agreement. It was significant since it was first break thorough towards improving relations with Moscow. “I was convinced that the time had arrived for the Government of Pakistan to review and revise its foreign policy.”

Once we were called a cornerstone of American foreign policy — most trusted alley of Washington East of Suez where the Americans had air bases and footholds to carry out their anti-communist operations.

Ayub Khan was totally sold out to the Americans that he allowed them air base near Peshawar to fly their spy planes for surveillance over the Soviet Union until the day when Russian fighters caught American spy plane U-2 piloted by Gerry Powers and brought it down to the ground. Soviet Premier Khrushchev was so furious that he red-pencilled Peshawar and threatened to destroy it in case of repetition.

ZAB as Pakistan’s foreign minister changed the direction of foreign policy and diversified defence procurement. He took Pakistan closest to China despite the fact Ayub offered India “joint defence against the common enemy from the north” during 1962 Sino-Indian border conflict to please American President John F. Kennedy. Pakistan owes it to Bhutto’s wisdom that not only it has become self-sufficient in defence when previously it suffered repeatedly from US arms embargo.

While all his efforts to diversify and have an independent foreign policy met American resistance, it was his fast track pursuit of nuclear programme after break up of Pakistan in 1971 and Indian explosion of a nuclear device — that got Americans so angry that he was communicated he would be made an horrible example and the person who later in 1979 executed this threat was Army Chief General Ziaul Haq.

Pakistan’s foreign policy fell from the sublime to ridiculous when it became a pathetic extension for pursuit of American strategic interests vigorously followed by General Pervez Musharraf. Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto had warned elder Bush in 1989 not to sustain and build Taliban as they would grow into Frankenstein impossible to control. As you sow so shall you reap. Both Americans and Pakistan are paying through their nose for helping a religiously fanatic force to bring down communist Soviet Union.

Notwithstanding rhetoric of American leaders like President Woodrow Wilson fighting a war to make world safe for democracy and the like, in foreign policy of a nation it is its national interests that matter most. Corner stone of American foreign policy has been the Monroe Doctrine. It first spelled out in 1823 briefly American policy as isolationist and that it would not allow European colonial powers to enter or interfere with states in the North America. President James Monroe asserted in his annual message to Congress: ‘The American continents … are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonisation by any European powers.

Being cornerstone as it is, it has remained a key factor in American foreign policy whether it is cold war, a standoff with the USSR over Bay of Pigs or its current pursuit of geo-strategic interests by creating uncertainties around the world. Its war on terror on sexed up dossiers to attack and destruction of Iraq on its mythical possession of weapons of mass destruction, invasion of Afghanistan since Taliban allegedly posed a threat to its security after 9-11, President Trump’s New Year offensive against Pakistan — are all a manifestation of the super power’s failure to tame Afghan Taliban to bring them around to serving its free-market imperialism aimed at seizing the Afghan resources.

One wonders who would tell President Trump that in diplomacy nice words matter more than shooting from the hip. Pakistan’s foreign minister has rightly told American president “no more” of his undiplomatic nonsense. It is good to know that Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi has called for National Security Committee meeting. However, it would be more appropriate to take the matter as suggested by Opposition leader Khursheed Shah to the Joint Session of the Parliament, to debate American jingoism and how to counter it effectively. Remember, Parliament’s decision to stop NATO supplies after Salala incident brought the Americans on their knees.

(Daily Times, Lahore)

Discover more from The Kashmir Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Don't miss a beat! The Kashmir Monitor delivers the latest Kashmir news, sports highlights from every league, political updates, entertainment buzz, and tech innovations happening right now.

A Newspaper company in Kashmir

Leave a Reply