Connect with us

Opinion

A Paradox of Plenty

The Kashmir Monitor

Published

🕒

on

IST

By Bhushan Parimoo

Jammu and Kashmir wildlife Protection Department appears to be caught in the web of a paradox of plenty. Behaving as if the assignment is too big for its feet. One among the popular questions, which everyone is concerned about is why the Protector of the wildlife by mandate has become the reason to cause irreparable damage to wildlife than it can claim to have protected and improved upon. It gets caught napping all the time to explain this woeful scenario before the full gaze of public to protect to, Preserve and develop wildlife. Unbelievable it may seem but that is the absolute truth about the affairs of wild life protection which leaves much to be desired is speaks of simple apathy that originates in corruption and nepotism that plagues the Department with the nonprofessional management banks upon the power presentations, planted media news, glossy brochures are indeed very catching, appealing for all those who hardly know the area, fact is Department the has all along been in the mode of deceit. It has caused vanishing of Wetlands, widespread encroachments of Lakes, caused pushing on brim the wildlife, be it be in waters, land of in air. Credit to host first international conference on protection of wild life on this planet goes to India. It was held in 1951 at New Delhi. Being the Prime Minister of the host country, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was elected as the first President of the Wild Life Congress. Declaring the conference open, Nehru in his maiden presidential address astounded the international delegates by stating: “This beautiful big cat (referring to white tiger) whom man could not tame, hence, declared this animal as ‘wild’. Should these innocent animals ever come to know what we men behave like; God alone knows what they will call us” .Ironically, even after more than six decades these prophetic words echo the truth of wild life , be it be Animals, Birds and Plants protection with regard to this State. It has been keenly observed that the Department seems to be at its wits how to manage the affairs entrusted to them, contain human –Animal Conflict after habitat of the wild Animals has been devastated before its eyes. What to preserve on priority how to preserve where from to start and how to proceed.

 

 

Department concern cannot claim that it had to raise data collections about flora and fauna growing in wild from scratches or build required infrastructure to make department functional to its optimum capacity. The fact is during Dogra rule Wildlife along Forest management was given utmost concern thus elaborately documented in details. Wildlife Game reserves then called used to under direct control of the Ruler, stressed on sustainable hunting and preservation of the Wildlife had been ensured then. With the advent of post 1947 wildlife with reckless exploiting of the Green Gold caused vanishing of the Wildlife at a faster rate even one thinks with little effort to contain it. The roll of achievements with regard to protect any wildlife species in the state is nil, in spite of the fact that the State had been fortunate enough to have second only to Gujarat area for the wildlife in the country. While as the Gujarat has just has just a couple of species to make mention on the other hand Jammu and Kashmir wildlife diversity in plenty of its own known world over for its rare biodiversity rich scenario. This makes one to think that when there is such a large area available to thrive Flora and Fauna in its natural habitat why all this allowed to go in vain. Wildlife protection Department has as per records 15912 Sq kms that comes to 15.59% of total geographical area of the state. Which is supplemented with by21251 Sq kms Forests together makes about 37% of total geographical area of the state. There are 4 National Parks, 14 Wildlife Sanctuaries, and 35 Conservation Reserves and about 3613 Wetlands out of which 8 are recognised under Ramsar Convention one of the Wular is Asia number one area wise Freshwater lake and the deepest in the country is Mansar. With pain in heart it is shared all this is for records only most of it is lost without any trace of these .Which makes the. It had been on consistent plea spear headed by then late Mir Anayatulullah, still fresh in the mind of those who still braved the death opposed it, close to power stressed all the time that unless and until Separate independent Department for the Protection and Development be not created. Wildlife shall be at receiving end which require scientific management .Despite apprehensions and reservation expressed then by the Academicians, retired Forest Officers and the Naturalists off course that Forest and Wildlife are one identity the inseparable part both go hand in hand together. Warned it shall be suicidal for to tear them apart just to please a few over Zealous Officers who conceived it an avenue to further their interest at the cost of Environment.

 

Thus a full- fledged independent Department was got created in 1981 to conduct it started the history to slow but steadily vanishing of the Wildlife in the state .Protection Department has been mandated under law to conservation of wildlife and biodiversity ensure sustainable management of wildlife resources and supervise wildlife activities both within and outside the protected areas to rehabilitate .Ensure protecting the wild life ,control poaching, smuggling and illegal trade in wildlife and its derivatives. And to tackle the wildlife related crimes in the State .But it has failed in its responsibility to discharge its bonafide duties mandated under Jammu and Kashmir wildlife Protection Act 1978 amended up to 2002 .What was handed to it by the Forest Department in 1981, be it be area or the quality and quantity of the Biodiversity, during its 37 years of its control caused to lose forever most of it. Department has neither any reliable list of the Wildlife it possess has in its areas on land, Water, and Air species wise not its number besides animals and plants have been got extinct or threatened with extinction. Doled out against law to please masters Wildlife areas without having it de-notified areas ,Golf Courses, to the Tourism development Authorities, the Ecotourism wing of its own has been made to go in slumber , failed to contain poaching and smuggling of banned wildlife items. Data with it is hardly very little reports of booking any such activity and prosecution rate again at brim. A few years back Moti Parimoo on visit to the state from United Sates brought to the notice of then Chief Wildlife Warden R.D Tiwari in his office at Srinagar that two Hanguls were reported to be killed in Chak Sangari area part of Dachigam National Park, and police case has been said to be registered besides a black bear has also been killed there. Chief Wildlife Warden feigned his ignorance. Parimoo shared another incident that wildlife Skins were being carried on the scooter in the broad day light in Sonwar Srinagar to it Tiwar responded why he has not caught the person. Aghast with this irresponsible response, Moti ji retorted back that he has not been powered to do so. Readers may like poaching of migratory birds during winter season goes on viral, sometime in newspapers, but not a single case is booked. So is the case with illegal hunting in the state being carried? This writer found Chief Wildlife Wardens had either hardly visited the areas under his jurisdiction during his tenure or day time tour of the nearby site, rarely found inspection note to take cognizance of his observation so does this percolates down .And over the years delinking it from Forest, Environment Ecology on the basis of the track record of the Wildlife Protection Department has been ill advised move, it proved so.

 

Cardinal blunder Department concerned is in habit of committing unchecked year after year despite repeated requests to correct its strategy accordingly that has yet to take cognizance of the fact Wildlife covers all undomesticated life forms including birds, insects, plants, fungi and even microscopic organisms .With conservation and Protection the natural habitat of wildlife species, we enrich our planet. To do so, we must keep the animals in their natural place. Conservation of natural habitats will also be beneficial for humans since it helps keep the essential watersheds intact and ensuring clean, fresh water. Which calls for a dire essential to maintain a healthy ecological balance on this earth, animals, plants and marine species are as important as humans civilisation during its evolution realised to protect the Wildlife for sustainable development for its survival. Scriptures emphasised that God created everything through him, and nothing was created except through him. “When a man has pity on all living creatures, then only is he noble.” – The Buddha. He who has a pity on the (even) a Sparrow and spares it’s life, to him God shall be merciful on the Day of Judgement. In Islam, the Holy Quran strongly enjoys upon Muslims to treat animals with compassion and not to abuse them. All creatures are believed to praise God even if this praise is not expressed in human language. Hinduism teaches respect for all creatures and compassion towards all beings is a basic principle of Hindu practice. Many animal seals were found in the Indus Valley excavations, which suggest to their importance in the ancient world. Vedic people gave a lot of importance to animals in their lives and associated them with the deities they worshipped. The Vedas mention several animals by name, such deer, boar, foxes, antelopes, boars, gazelles, jackals, lions, monkeys, rabbits, wolves, bears, beavers, rats, etc. They knew the importance of horses, elephants, cows, bulls, sheep, goats, and other domesticated animals in both religious and economic activity. Yellow Stone National Park is the first to establish in the world in 1872in America. In the Subcontinent it was Hailey National Park, renamed Jim Corbett National Park Established in the year 1936 .But credit goes to late Maharaja Partap Sigh who restricted hunting as far back as in 1872. Point is should State Subjects in particular remain a mute spectator till all is lost?

 

(The writer is a Jammu based environmentalist)


The Kashmir Monitor is the fastest growing newspaper as well as digitial platform covering news from all angles.

Advertisement
Loading...
Comments

Opinion

Indian elections, South Asian concerns

The Kashmir Monitor

Published

on

By Kanak Mani Dixit

The staggering scale of the election that is under way in India with just under a billion voters is hard for the mind to grapple with, even in this densely populated neighbourhood that includes Bangladesh and Pakistan. The level of worry is also at a pitch, for India should be the bulwark against weakening democracy in a world of Bolsonaro (Brazil), Duterte (the Philippines), Erdogan (Turkey), Putin (Russia) and Trump (the U.S.) not to mention the People’s Republic of China.

Modern India, created by M.K. Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru and their cohort, should be raising the standard for social justice and grass-roots democracy, and against destructive right-wing populism. This has not quite been Prime Minister NarendraModi’s record, and hence the concern that another five years would redefine the very idea of India.

 

Already, the term ‘world’s largest democracy’ is achieving banality as India gains majoritarian momentum. Centralised control of society would never be possible in such a vast and variegated society of sub-nationalities, we were told, but look at what is happening.

The high principle and probity of India’s political class, bureaucracy, academia and civil society are now exceptions rather than the rule. India’s Ambassadors are no longer the self-confident professionals we knew for decades, they act today like timid note-takers. Higher education is directed by those who insist that the achievements of Vedic era science included flying machines and organ transplants. Meanwhile, the adventurism that marked economic management, including immiseration through demonetisation, has been ‘managed’ through loyal social and corporate media.

Intellectual toadyism and crony capitalism have overtaken New Delhi on a subcontinental scale, but sooner than later this drift towards regimented society and whispered dissent must be reversed. Too much is at stake for too many citizens — India must revert to the true, messy and contested democracy we have known and appreciated.

Parliamentary democracy is the governance procedure adopted by each and every country of South Asia, and the Indian practice has always been held up as the example.

The precedents set by India’s courts are studied elsewhere, the professionalism of the civil service is regarded as the benchmark, and everyone else seeks the aspirational welfare state set in motion in India in the middle of the 20th century. This is why we watch worried as Indian democracy weakens in step with its economy, as inter-community relationships within India descend to one-sided animus, and as New Delhi’s global clout decreases in inverse proportion to Beijing’s.

To cover weaknesses in governance and promises undelivered, Mr.Modi as the solo electoral face of the BharatiyaJanata Party (BJP) has whipped up a tornado of militarised nationalism that projects Pakistan as the exclusive enemy. No one dares remind the Indian voters that Pakistan is the far weaker power; its people are battling fanatical demons more than are Indian citizens; Pakistan is a large potential market for India’s goods and services; and the future of Kashmir must be based on Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.

Meanwhile, Lahore intellectuals watch with apprehension as India copies the excesses of Pakistan’s theocratic state. Dhaka observers are numbed into silence with New Delhi’s vigorous backing of Prime Minister Sheikh HasinaWajed as she constructs an intolerant one-party regime. Colombo rides a geopolitical see-saw as New Delhi shadow-boxes Beijing. And Kathmandu wonders whether New Delhi has it in itself to concede that the amplified Chinese involvement in Nepal is the result of the Great Blockade of 2015-16.

India has been reduced to a giant nervously finger-counting friends made or lost to China. The media triumphalism that greets even modest shifts in India’s favour — be it in Male or Thimphu — marks unnecessarily low self-esteem. New Delhi seems preoccupied with ‘managing’ South Asian countries when it should be commanding the global platforms on climate alteration, protection of pluralism and correcting imbalances in global wealth.

Few note the incongruity of a New Delhi loudly daring Islamabad while acting coy on Beijing, which one would have thought was the real adversary or competitor. Meanwhile India’s celebrated soft power wilts even as the Chinese work to wipe out their English deficit, and Beijing places Confucius Institutes in far corners. Chinese goods flood the Indian market, Chinese research and development gallops ahead of India’s, and Beijing convincingly moves to tackle environmental degradation.

India seems drowsy and lethargic in contrast. South Asia as a whole — much of it the historical ‘India’ — roots for Indian democracy even while welcoming Chinese investment, infrastructure loans and tourists. Also because it has the largest population in the Subcontinent, India is expected to lead South Asia on myriad issues including the death-dealing Indo-Gangetic smog, fertilizer and pesticide use, cross-border vectors, arsenic poisoning, regional commerce and economic rationalisation, social inclusion and the Human Development Index and so on. But leadership requires humility, to study, for example, how adjacent societies have successfully tackled great challenges — look at Bangladesh surging towards middle income country status.

Nepal has long been regarded by exasperated New Delhi policy-makers as the South Asian basket case sending out migrant labour to India. This much is true, but it also emerges that the Nepal economy is the seventh largest sender of remittance to India after the UAE, the U.S., Saudi Arabia, the U.K., Bangladesh and Canada. Unlike these others, Nepal’s remittances go to India’s poorest parts, in Bihar, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal.

We switch on India’s news channels and find an abysmal common denominator in terms of civility and rationality. The national intelligentsia seems intimidated, unable to challenge the rigid, dangerously populist narrative of the BJP/RashtriyaSwayamsevakSangh (RSS). We watch as the National Register of Citizens propels statelessness, as the refoulement of Rohingyarefugees points to a reckless disregard for fundamental humanitarian principles, and as majoritarianism weakens the pillar of representative democracy that is the protection of minorities.

India is indeed large and important, but the chest size of a country does not translate into equity, social justice or international standing. Because nearly 20% of humanity lives within its boundaries, when India falters, the pit of despair and the potential for violence open up wide and deep.

The South Asia that New Delhi’s policy and opinion-makers should consider is not the centralised Jambudvipa mega-state of the RSS imagination. Instead, the ideal South Asian regionalism is all about limiting the power of the national capitals, devolving power to federal units and strengthening local democracy.

Modi’s own idea of regionalism is one where he calls the shots. The start of his current term was marked by an attempt to dictate to the neighbours, after which the pendulum swung to the other extreme. The freeze put by India on the inter-governmental South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is only a cynical means to keep Pakistan out of the club.

The sabotaging of SAARC can hardly be considered a victory, for that feather-light geopolitical stratagem fails to consider that regionalism is a potent means to bring economic growth and social justice to India’s own poverty-stricken ‘peripheral regions’ from Assam to Purvanchal to Rajasthan. For its own security and prosperity as well as that of the rest of us, India must re-connect with South Asia.

Sub continental regionalism is also important to achieve New Delhi’s ambitions on the world stage, including that coveted seat at the UN Security Council. India’s global comeback will start the day New Delhi think tanks begin questioning South and North Block rather than serving as purveyors of spin. On South Asian matters, they should pull out a copy of the Gujral Doctrine from the archives, to be dusted and re-examined.

We seek an India that is prosperous and advancing at double digit growth, not only because what this would mean for its 1.35 billion citizens, but to the other 500 million South Asians. For its own selfish interests, the rest of South Asia wants India to succeed in the world.

(Kanak Mani Dixit, a writer and journalist based in Kathmandu, is the founding editor of the Colombo-based magazine, ‘HimalSouthasian’. Source: The Hindu)

Continue Reading

Opinion

Witnessing the political tamasha in Kashmir

The Kashmir Monitor

Published

on

By Meer Abass

At the onset of election fever, political parties belonging to exploiting ruling class use all kinds of tricks to lure voters on their side and grab power. Politicians resort to anything under the sky to woo voters and counter their rival parties. It’s obvious that in this cut-throat scheme of promises, hardly any political party has a programme or policy that genuinely aims well-being of the people of the state.

Every party claims that their leader is the ‘lion’ of the political jungle as tamashaof the hectic assembly poll campaign in Jammu and Kashmir reaches its culmination.
Getting elected should be very easy. If for five years you work for your voters without fear or favour then getting elected should not cost a dime. So why getting elected costs so much and takes so much effort?

 

The answer lies in the party system and the political illiteracy that our state suffers from.

Our political illiteracy levels are near 95% or more. Even the educated among us are politically illiterate. They stopped getting any education after they clear the class 10 during which they had Civics as a subject (of course this does not include people who did their BA and MA in Political Science).

Our political party system ensures that no representative of the people is able to do anything for the people that elect him/her. He has to follow the diktat of the party. And the party is driven by lobbies that want to get laws and rules made that benefit them. Thus even if there is a lawmaker who wants to work for his constituents, he can’t. Thus at the end of the tenure, if his party has something to show (which they usually don’t have), he can expect to get elected again otherwise he has to depend on the bluff of the party and its ability to convince the people that it has done well for them. Or fake them with the bluster of a fake leader.

And if the representative has been doing good work then his constituents will not even want to see him or hear him during election time. They would have been in touch with him all through the five years and would know what he/she has done and delivered. Thus the cost of getting elected would be very negligible.

Now that is the kind of politics that we should all aspire and work for.

And for a politician that is connected to the people, his/her formal education would not matter as much as his/her understanding of the pain points of his voters and his/her ability to solve their problems.

Therefore, there are two things you can do, one is to get a political education and second is to choose a representative that does work for you and not blindly toe the party line. Best would be to have a representative that represents you and not a political party.

“Walayvasie, aslisherhayy, aaaway (come, my friend. The original lion has come),” sing Kashmiri women folk in traditional ‘rauf’ dance at political rallies.

“Naklishera vatu daira, aslisheraaagaya (it’s time for fake lions to pack bags as the original lion has arrived at the scene,” is a common slogan witnessed in the campaigns right now in the Kashmir valley.

While every party has its own share of slogans but it is the “Sher” which is the common thread in their campaigns in the politically charged atmosphere in the Valley. Kashmir wildlife does not include lions.

The name of ‘Sher-e-Kashmir’ has been prefixed with a prestigious medical institute in the Valley, an agriculture university, gallantry medals for police, employment scheme and the only cricket ground in the Valley.

PDP also invoked ‘sher’ besides its slogans like “SabzukAlam chum aathskyath, aasiydeetaarParvardighar (The green flag is in my hand and God will help me crossing all hurdles)” besides the ‘Sher’ slogan. The flag of PDP party is green.

National Conference has some more to offer their voters like “aapkimushkilkabaaetbarhul, sirfhalhalhal (the only way for a honourable solution to your problems is plough). Plough is the symbol of National Conference.

There are multiple dimensions to how Kashmiris interpret elections. Some call it political maturity and see it as a befitting strategy to avoid having a party in power that has no sensibilities about Kashmir. Those who vote believe that if Kashmiris don’t vote, then the elected representatives will go down the same way as the previous ones have. Many see it as political leverage in negotiating for issues such as an immediate and urgent repeal of draconian laws in force in Kashmir and the release of youth who have been booked under these laws. Some consider it important for a long-term political solution to the conflict, which they think is only possible through consistent dialogue and negotiation with New Delhi, Islamabad and Kashmir.

BJP, besides its “abkibaarModisarkar” slogans, has banners hanging at various traffic cross sections “aaobadle Jammu Kashmir kehaalat, aaochaleModikesaath (let’s change Jammu and Kashmir’s destiny, let’s walk with Modi).”

It is said that in Kashmir nothing is straight except poplar trees, and it reflects the general persona of the biotic of Kashmir. Do we actually qualify to be humans, well what’s happening on the ground and has happened in the past, are contesting this prerogative. So the question arises, who is a common Kashmiri? And what are the aspirations, responsibilities and expectations out of common Kashmiri?

(Author is an Assistant Professor, Department of English, Govt Degree College Handwara. Feedback at meerabas32@gmail.com)

Continue Reading

Opinion

Running on fear in 2019

The Kashmir Monitor

Published

on

By Barkha Dutt

NarendraModi, India’s powerful prime minister, is seeking a second term. But in 2019, he is sounding less like the man who campaigned in 2014 and much more like his previous avatar — the abrasive, vitriolic and inflammatory chief minister of Gujarat.

His first national election five years ago was built on aspiration. Then he used to proclaim that the country’s constitution was his only holy book; he promised “achhe din” (good days) and “vikas” (development).

 

This campaign, by contrast, has been built on fear and on the othering of his political opposition as anti-national, anti-Hindu and, in antithesis to Modi’s own projected machismo, wimpish.

There is little or no conversation about the performance of his government, the economy or jobs. A leaked report from the National Statistical Commission (which the government contested) placed unemployment numbers at a four-decade high; a certain amount of deflection and changing the subject is political compulsion.

But the Modi-led BharatiyaJanata Party campaign has descended from spin to brazen coarseness, fear-mongering and Islamophobia.

In the 2019 production, Modi has cast himself as the “chowkidar,” or watchman — the guardian at the gate who will defend the country against predators and terrorists. The decision to order an airstrike inside Pakistan as retaliation for the terrorist attack in Pulwama, Kashmir, that killed 40 paramilitary police officers has become a major element in his narrative.

Modi even delivered a speech with photographs of the men who were killed in the Kashmir strike forming the stage backdrop; he also asked young voters to dedicate their ballot to the military personnel who led the assault inside Pakistan. Yogi Adityanath, the saffron-robed monk chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous and politically important state, added insult to injury by describing the military as Modi’s “sena” — or Modi’s army, comments for which he has been censured by the Election Commission.

The BJP has defended this by arguing that because the prime minister took a great risk by sanctioning the Pakistan strike — in contrast to the Congress, which took no military action even after the Mumbai terrorist attack in 2008 — the party has every right to politically own the decision. But given the flamboyant nationalism the party claims as its defining characteristic, this debasement of India’s armed forces is, frankly, impossible to justify.

The young daughter of a soldier killed in the Pulwama terrorist attack called out the bluff. “My father did not die for NarendraModi or Rahul Gandhi. He died for India,” ApoorvaRawat, 20, told me. “Can’t you run a campaign without using our families to win votes?”

Using soldiers as political fodder is bad enough. But even worse is the Modi campaign’s message to India’s 172 million Muslims. In the past few years, Muslim cattle traders have been repeatedly targeted by right-wing mobs on fabricated charges of trading in beef. During this campaign, the men charged with the 2015 lynching of Mohammed Akhlaq, a Muslim ironsmith in Dadri, were given front-row seats at a BJP election rally.

A prominent government minister has warned Muslims to vote for her or face the consequences. And in one of the worst election speeches of the season, the prime minister taunted Rahul Gandhi, leader of the opposition Congress party, for running away from Hindu voters to a constituency in the south where “the majority is a minority.” His comments were about Gandhi’s decision to fight from two seats, Wayanad in the southern state of Kerala in addition to his long-standing parliamentary seat in the north. Attacking the Congress is fair but implicit in this particular attack was the suggestion that a parliamentary seat dominated by Muslims is something to be embarrassed of.

Every single day, the marginalization and humiliation of India’s Muslim citizens are being reinforced.

The final blow came from the BJP president, Amit Shah, Modi’s second in command and said to be the only person the prime minister trusts. Shah has vowed to create a national citizens’ registry that will “remove every single infiltrator from the country” unless they happen to be Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist. The official sanction of crude religious majoritarianism did not even bother to disguise its anti-Muslim bigotry. It was tweeted out by the party handle with the hashtag #NaMoForNewIndia — a model of “New India” eroding the very basis of old India: constitutionally protected pluralism.

So far, despite the virulence of the campaign he is steering, Modi seems to be comfortably ahead. There is no visible backlash to even his most divisive words. His persona as a spartan, non-corrupt bachelor, who is “not in politics for himself” — this I’ve heard repeatedly from voters — and his reputation as a decisive leader seem to offset the flaws voters now concede he has.

Admittedly, there is no euphoria of the kind that India witnessed in 2014. But nor is there any widespread anger. And when it comes down to it, voters often add “who else is there” to their criticism of Modi’s first term. It’s like the post-romance phase of a personal relationship — you’re no longer smitten, the sheen has worn off, but until a better option comes along, in your mind he or she is as good as it gets, with all of the flaws. You tell yourself that the relationship is better than being single.

For this, India’s opposition must take the blame. Crude and sexist language by leaders from within their own ranks — such as Azam Khan, the regional leader who commented on the underpants of his female adversary — have somewhat blunted the moral force of their attack on the BJP.

The opposition also remains fragmented and divided. It has been too slow to produce a counter-narrative, and this has only bolstered Modi’s chances. It suits Modi to make himself the central issue of this election and ask, Modi vs. who?

The answer to that would be Modi vs. math.

In the absence of any other national persona to take on the tough-as-nails, ruthless and charismatic Modi, the opposition’s best bet is to bury its differences and work on a series of local alliances. Modi wants a presidential-style election. The opposition can only counter that with regional coalitions of varied caste groups and communities.

For the moment, in one of India’s ugliest election campaigns, the advantage is with Modi.

Chances are that he will be prime minister again. But there has been absolutely nothing prime ministerial about his campaign.

(washingtonpost.com)

Continue Reading

Latest News

Subscribe to The Kashmir Monitor via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Kashmir Monitor and receive notifications of new stories by email.

Join 1,006,241 other subscribers

Archives

April 2019
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Advertisement