Connect with us

Lead Stories

Shopian Killings: No faith in judiciary, slain civilians’ families refuse to lodge complaint

Monitor News Bureau





Shopian, Mar 09: Families of four civilians killed at Shopian have not lodging any formal complaint as they consider the judiciary “biased and not for the people of Kashmir”.
Four civilians—Mohammad Shahid Khan (20), Suhail Khalil Wagay (22), Shahnawaz Ahmad Wagay (23) and Gowhar Ahmad Lone (24)—were killed by the government forces near Shopian’s Pahnoo village on Sunday.
The army, in its first two statements, had termed the slain civilians over ground workers (OGW).
Later in a press conference, a senior army official had said, “No doubt they (locals) were civilians, but investigations will reveal their role with militants.”
The families of the four deceased youths believe that the “investigation will go nowhere”, same as the several other cases of civilian killings in Kashmir did.
“You are talking about justice? What happened to those three civilians?” said Manzoor Ahmad, a family member of Suhail, citing the incident of Shopian’s Gawonpora village, where three civilians were shot dead by the army in January.
“Aasiya and Neelofer, our two little angels, were raped, murdered and thrown away to die. Nine years have passed since, what about them? What happened to that case and investigation?” he further questioned.
Manzoor said that he “openly challenges” the police and the army to bring any “valid evidence” to prove that Suhail was an OGW or a militant’s associate.
“How easily they termed him an OGW just to hide their wrongdoings. They have seized Suhail’s mobile, right? Go, ask them to check and bring any proof against him? This is my open challenge,” he said.
He said, “Neither the families is going to lodge an FIR, nor do they expect a judicial probe.”
Another relative, Mohammad Yaseen, sitting next to Manzoor, said, “If Suhail was an OGW, why didn’t they arrest him instead of killing him?”
“One of the best armies in the world isn’t smart enough to catch an OGW, investigate, and catch a few more? Whom are they fooling?” Yaseen said.
“There are thousands of Suhails who have died in the past. None of them got justice, nor will he. The people of Kashmir, especially Shopian, are now used to these killings.”
Similarly, Bashir Ahmad, maternal uncle of Gowhar, too, believes that his nephew’s case of army killing will get overlooked like many others.
“I am going to meet the SHO, pull his collar, and I am going to question him the killing of my nephew. He will push me back, maybe abuse me, and that is it. What more will happen?” he said. “The people of Kashmir have forgotten the meaning of justice.”
If Gowhar was an OGW, Bashir questioned, “Why the police hasn’t even once in the past come to our place and informed us about it?”
“We have just accepted Gowhar’s death, and we expect nothing.”
Farooq Ahmad, the elder brother of Shahnawaz, blamed the police for “shielding army’s mistakes and supporting civilian killings”.
“The local police here are the biggest traitors. And whom shall we go to for filing a complaint?” he said. “To someone who has played an equal role in the killing of my brother?”
Farooq believes that they would be offered money to shut their mouths if they would raise voice against the killing of Shahnawaz.
“No one wants their money. Nothing will back my elder brother back to me. We have lost the faith in the system, and innocent killings will go on until we are not set free,” he said.
Mohsin Khan, Shahid’s elder brother, too, denied filing any official complaint.
Citing the Supreme Court’s stay on Major Aditya, against whom an FIR was filed by the local police for the killing of three civilians in Shopian in January, Mohsin said, “That answer as to why I do not want to file a complaint.”
“Killing innocent locals in Kashmir has become a norm, and will continue to be, unless India doesn’t set us free.”


Lead Stories

CJI’s office comes under RTI, rules SC




New Delhi, Nov 13: The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that the office of the Chief Justice of India was a public authority and fell within the ambit of the Right to Information Act.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi upheld the 2010 Delhi High Court verdict and dismissed three appeals filed by Secretary General of the Supreme Court and the Central Public Information officer of the apex court.

Cautioning that RTI could be used as a tool of surveillance, the top court in its judgment, held that judicial independence had to be kept in mind while dealing with transparency.


The bench, also comprising Justices N V Ramana, D Y Chandrachud, Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, said only the names of judges recommended by the Collegium for appointment could be disclosed, not the reasons.

While the CJI and Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna penned one judgment, Justices Ramana and Chandrachud wrote separate verdicts.

It said that the Right to Privacy was an important aspect and it had to be balanced with transparency while deciding to give out information from the office of the Chief Justice. Justice Chandrachud said the judiciary could not function in total insulation as judges enjoy constitutional posts and discharge public duty.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna said independence of the judiciary and transparency went hand in hand.

Justice Ramana, who concurred with Justice Khanna, said there should be a balancing formula for Right to Privacy and right to transparency and independence of judiciary should be protected from breach.

The High Court on January 10, 2010 had held that the CJI office came within the ambit of the RTI law, saying judicial independence was not a judge’s privilege, but a responsibility cast upon him.

The 88-page judgment was seen as a personal setback to the then CJI, K G Balakrishnan, who had been opposed to disclosure of information relating to judges under the RTI Act.

The high court verdict was delivered by a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice A P Shah (since retired) and Justices Vikramjit Sen and S Muralidhar. The bench had dismissed a plea of the Supreme Court that contended bringing the CJI’s office within the RTI Act would ‘hamper’ judicial independence.

Justice Sen has retired from the apex court, while Justice Murlidhar is a sitting judge of the High Court.

The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by RTI activist S C Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the apex court should not have been judging its own cause, it was hearing the appeals due to the “doctrine of necessity”.

The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the Right To Information Act as ‘unfortunate’ and ‘disturbing’, asking: “Do judges inhabit a different universe?”

He had submitted the apex court had always stood for transparency in functioning of other organs of State, but it developed cold feet when its own issues required attention. Referring to the RTI provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always ‘outweigh’ personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with ‘judicial independence’, he said the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from ‘public scrutiny’.

Transparency activists on Wednesday welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision, saying the apex court had reiterated the established position in law in the matter.

“I welcome the decision of the constitution bench to reiterate the established position in law that the CJI is a public authority under the Right to Information (RTI) Act,” said Venkatesh Nayak, head of access to information programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), an NGO.

About the Supreme Court’s remark that RTI could not be used as a tool of surveillance, Nayak termed it as an “extremely unfortunate” observation. “Surveillance has unfortunately been equated with transparency that is required under a law duly passed by Parliament,” he told PTI.

Nayak said surveillance was what the government often does under executive instructions and that was not the purpose of the RTI Act. “People whose cases relating to their life, liberty, property and rights, are decided by the high courts and the Supreme Court. People have the right to know not only the criteria but all material that formed the basis of making the decision regarding appointments of judges in accordance with the provisions of the RTI Act,” he said.

Nayak said where exemptions were available under the RTI Act, they would be legitimately invoked by public authorities and all other information should be in the public domain. He said the appointment of judges, who were public functionary, was a public act.

“People have the right to know everything that is done in a public way by a government, in a democratic country, which must be accountable and responsible,” Nayak said. Former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also hailed the top court’s decision. “I had expected the same decision to come as logically there was nothing else. It is unfortunate that this has taken 10 years. The CIC has upheld this. The Delhi HC had also upheld this. Now, the SC has upheld this. All public servants that are paid by the government are a public service, no matter what the position is. You need to be accountable for your work. I congratulate the Chief Justice and the court for having given such a decision,” he said.

RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal lauded the top court’s verdict. “I welcome the Supreme Court’s verdict. It is a victory of the RTI Act,” he said.

Another activist Ajay Dubey said the apex court’s decision was ‘historic’. “It is a historic decision and I welcome it. All decisions made by a public authority must be in public domain and under the RTI Act,” he said.

Dubey, however, expressed shock over the top court’s remark that the RTI Act cannot be used as a tool of surveillance.

Continue Reading

Lead Stories

Shopkeeper shot dead in Tral

Monitor News Bureau



Srinagar, Nov 13: Unidentified gunmen shot dead a shopkeeper at Tral in South Kashmir’s Puwlama district on Wednesday, police said.

The slain was in his shop near Old Bus Stand, Tral, 36 kms from here, when pistol borne masked men shot at him from point-blank range at around 3 p.m.

Zarger was immediately shifted to a nearby hospital, where doctors declared him brought dead.


A police official while confirming the killing said the slain hailed from Tral town.

Reports said the killing created panic in the town.

In recent weeks, militants have started targeting civilians and hurling grenades at crowded places to impose shutdown in the Valley.

Last Monday one civilian died while over 40 were injured when militants threw a grenade in a crowded market near city center Lal Chowk in Srinagar.

Prior to that, non-local laborers, truck drivers and fruit traders were targeted by the militants in south Kashmir.

On August 30, unidentified gunmen shot dead a 65-year-old shopkeeper at Parimpora area of Srinagar.  On September 30, unidentified gunmen shot at apple grower at Sopore leaving the grower and four others including a four-year-old girl injured.

The Valley witnessed spontaneous shutdown after the Center abrogated the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 and bifurcated the erstwhile state into two union territories on August 5.

However, in recent weeks the impact of the shutdown is waning as more and more people are resuming their normal activities across Kashmir.

Continue Reading

Lead Stories

Yet another accident: Four killed, 5 injured in Kishtwar mishap

Press Trust of India



Jammu, Nov 13: Four people were killed and five others injured when a vehicle skidded off the road and rolled down into a deep gorge in Kishtwar district on Wednesday, officials said.

The vehicle, carrying pilgrims from Palmar to the Sarthal temple, fell into the gorge after the driver lost control over it, they said.

Police and locals rushed to the spot and shifted the injured to a district hospital in Kishtwar, where doctors declared four of them brought dead, the officials said.


Three critically injured people were shifted to the Government Medical College here through a chopper for specialised treatment.

District administration, Kishtwar, provided immediate relief of Rs 10,000 each to the family members of the deceased and 5,000 each to the injured.

This is the second such incident in 24 hours as 16 people, including five women and three children, were killed on Tuesday when a passenger vehicle skidded off the road and fell into a deep gorge in Doda district.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Subscribe to The Kashmir Monitor

Enter your email address to subscribe to this The Kashmir Monitor and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,021,459 other subscribers


November 2019
« Oct