Connect with us

Lead Stories

SC to hear plea challenging Art 370 in April

Press Trust of India





New Delhi, Nov 16: The Supreme Court Friday said it will hear in April a plea challenging the validity of Article 370 of the Constitution, which gives special status to Jammu and Kashmir, following a request by the state and the Centre.
A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah said it will hear the matter in the first week of April 2019 after Attorney General K K Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, sought adjournment on the ground that the current situation is very sensitive.
“The political situation in the state is such that the matter should not be heard at this time,” he said.
Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi and advocate Shoeb Alam, appearing for Jammu and Kashmir said that a letter has been circulated seeking adjournment due to the ongoing nine-phase Panchayat polls in the state.
To this, the bench said that it can tag the matter along with a batch of pending petitions challenging Article 35A of the Constitution, under which special rights and privileges are granted to the “permanent residents” of the state.
The suggestion of the bench was opposed by the counsels for the state saying that the two issues are different entirely and the plea should not be tagged along with Article 35A pending petitions.
The bench then posted the matter for further hearing in first week of April, 2019.
On April 3, the apex court had said that Article 370 of the Constitution is not a temporary provision.
The top court had said that in its earlier verdict of 2017 in the SARFESI case, it has been already held that Article 370 was “not a temporary provision”.
“The issue concerned is covered by the judgement of this court in the 2017 SARFAESI matter, where we have held that despite the headnote of Article 370, it is not a temporary provision,” the court had said.
The court was hearing an appeal filed by petitioner Kumari Vijayalakshmi Jha, against the Delhi High Court’s April 11, 2017 order dismissing the plea seeking a declaration that Article 370 is temporary in nature.
The petitioner had claimed before the high court that Article 370 was a temporary provision that had lapsed with the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly in 1957.
The petition had said that the continuance of the temporary provision of Article 370 even after dissolution of Constituent Assembly of J&K, and that of J&K Constitution which has never got the assent of the President of India or Parliament or the government of India, “amounts to fraud on the basic structure of our Constitution”.


Lead Stories

Jamaat ban challenged in court

JK HC seeks GoI response by Apr 22

Press Trust of India



Srinagar, Mar 26: The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has issued a notice to the Centre and sought its response by April 22 on a petition challenging the recent ban on the Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) in the state.

Acting on a petition by Mehraj Azeem (61), a former member of the Jamaat, a single bench of Justice Tashi Rabstan on Monday directed the Union Home Secretary to file response and objections to the petition by the next date of hearing on April 22.

The notice was accepted by Assistant Solicitor General Tahir Majeed Shamshi, who was present in the court.


The Centre in a notification issued on February 28 banned Jamat-e-Islami Jammu and Kashmir for five years under ‘anti-terror’ law on grounds that it was “in close touch” with militant outfits and is expected to “escalate secessionist movement” in the state.

However, the petitioner’s counsel, Syed Musaib, said the government did not follow the procedure while issuing the notification and the Jamaat was banned without giving it a chance to represent its case which was “violative of the constitutional safeguards”.

“Even if certain material is available with the respondents, the same would constitute an incriminating material against a single individual of the organisation and not against the organisation as a whole. The same has to be dealt in accordance with the law of land and could not be used to muzzle and gag an entire political organisation having decades of existence,” the petitioner said.

He submitted that “bans are ineffective in contesting dissenting politics overtly, and are directly responsible for clandestine politics.”

The petitioner’s counsel while praying for setting aside of the ban order, submitted that free speech and right to form unions/associations was intrinsic in a democratic polity.

The organisation, as per the petitioner, played a significant role in bringing the state back on track after the catastrophic flood of 2014 by engaging itself in voluntary work.

“The contribution of the Jama’at in the field of education and other such sectors is commendable. The said organisation had contested elections both Parliamentary as well as Assembly and has a registered election symbol,” he added.

The counsel also challenged the constitution of the tribunal headed by a J-K High Court judge to decide if the Jamaat was an unlawful association, saying the Centre lacks the executive competence to enact such provision in respect of the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

The group has been banned for five years. It has to be ratified by a tribunal constituted by the Home Ministry.

The outfit, which was formed in 1945 as a chapter of the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and separated in 1953 due to differences over political ideology with the parent body, was banned in 1990.
The previous ban lapsed in 1995 and since then it has never been invoked again.

Continue Reading

Lead Stories

Omar-Mehbooba banter picks up pace

Jibes include: NIA, state flag, fake state subjects, killings, special status, POTA…

Hirra Azmat



Srinagar, Mar 26: Two former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Ministers Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti are busy picking holes in each other’s tenures these days in a build up to the Parliamentary elections beginning next month.

Omar, the National Conference vice president, Tuesday said that PDP president Mehbooba Mufti is the person who couldn’t save the flag of the state and she, thus, should not claim to protect the state’s special position.

“It was in PDP’s tenure that an order was passed. It said that state’s flag should be hoisted in every department. Within two days, Mehbooba ji revoked the order,” he said, while addressing a large gathering at Flood Colony Baramulla.


The NC vice president lashed out at Mehbooba, blaming her for the large number of killings and youth joining militant ranks during her regime.

“Basharat Bukhari Sahib is sitting beside me right now. He is the same person who sent Mehbooba ji a file through a minister. In the file, it was mentioned that the fake state subjects should be cancelled. Today, I am asking Mehbooba ji: what did you do with that file?” he asked.

He said in a reference to Mehbooba Mufti, “To remain in BJP’s good books and secure your party, you kept the file under the wraps. Now do you think you will protect the state’s special position? You are mistaken, you can’t do anything. We lost so many youngsters and a large section of educated youth took to arms in your tenure. The same youth who deserved a better future were dragged to the graveyards.”

He was also critical of the BJP-led central government and said that it was the Sikh Community and not Prime Minister Narendra Modi who rescued Kashmiris living in other states from the recent mob violence.

Omar, while launching a scathing attack at Modi Government said that it was Sikh brethren across India who wholeheartedly offered their places for runaway Kashmiris fearing mob violence after the Pulwama attack.

“Do you again want to see the Kashmiris living outside the state being targeted for another five years? Our children studying outside were singled out and forced to leave their accommodations. This all happened because of BJP-RSS camaraderie,” he said.

Omar claimed that for ten days the response of the Prime Minister to the violence against Kashmiris was awaited but nothing happened.

“We waited in anticipation that our PM will speak for our rights and ensure protection for the students. But it was our Sikh brothers in Punjab, Haryana and Delhi who saved Kashmiris and not the Central Government.”

NC brought NIA to Kashmir: Mehbooba Mufti

Former chief minister and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president, Mehbooba Mufti on Tuesday blamed National Conference (NC) for the current proceedings of National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Jammu and Kashmir.

Mehbooba, while talking to reporters at Baramulla on the sidelines of her party’s rally, said that it was National Conference-Congress regime led by Omar Abdullah in 2009, which brought NIA to J&K.
“When NC forged an alliance with BJP in 2009, they brought in Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) to the state, gave away seven power projects, and also brought NIA to the state,” Mufti said, adding that PDP was “always against such anti-people moves”.

“On the contrary, we categorically told BJP not to tamper with Article 370, demanded the revocation of AFSPA, and withdrawal of army from civilian areas,” she said.

“While in power, we revoked FIRs against thousands of detained youth whereas BJP had planned other nefarious designs which included a crackdown on JEI, Moulvis, NIA raids on separatists but I didn’t allow them to do it,” she claimed.

Mufti said her party introduced several “peace building” measures but got a cold shoulder in return.
“Militants were not supportive when I forced BJP to have ceasefire for a month. I wanted to have a dialogue with separatist leaders and even a parliamentary committee visited Kashmir in 2016 but
they shut their doors. Dineshwar Sharma was appointed as the interlocutor to have dialogue with the separatist leadership but they didn’t support it,” she said.
She also said that oppressive measures through NIA won’t yield any result, but a political solution is the only way out to resolve Kashmir issue. “You cannot resolve the issues by imposing bans and
seizing the properties but a political issue needs a political resolution only,” Mehbooba said.

She also welcomed the reports of opening of Sharda Peeth by Pakistan, saying that the step will benefit Kashmiri Pandits as it was the long pending demand of the particular community.

Continue Reading

Lead Stories

Indo-Pak relations to remain tense till polls: Imran

Press Trust of India



Islamabad, Mar 26: Prime Minister Imran Khan has said Indo-Pak relations would remain tense till the general elections in India are over.

Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the February 14 attack by Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed in Pulwama.

Amid mounting outrage, the Indian Air Force carried out a strike, hitting what it said was a JeM training camp in Balakot, deep inside Pakistan on February 26. The next day, Pakistan Air Force retaliated and downed a MiG-21 in an aerial combat and captured an Indian pilot, who was handed over to India later.


Khan said shadows of war were still hovering over Pakistan and India as Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration could go for “another misadventure” before the general elections.

“The danger is not over. The situation will remain tense till forthcoming general elections in India. We are already prepared to avert any aggression from India,” Dawn quoted Khan as saying.

Khan also claimed that he cancelled his scheduled meeting with the Taliban in Islamabad due to “concerns” expressed by the Afghan government.

The Taliban last month said that its representatives would visit Islamabad to meet Prime Minister Khan on February 18.

Media reports later suggested that the Taliban called off the meeting as most of the members of their negotiating team could not travel to Pakistan due to sanctions imposed on them by the US and the United Nations.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Subscribe to The Kashmir Monitor via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Kashmir Monitor and receive notifications of new stories by email.

Join 1,001,271 other subscribers


March 2019
« Feb